articleAmerican PsychologistJan 1, 2006Closed access

Arbitrary metrics in psychology.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · Florida International University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Many psychological tests have arbitrary metrics but are appropriate for testing psychological theories. Metric arbitrariness is a concern, however, when researchers wish to draw inferences about the true, absolute standing of a group or individual on the latent psychological dimension being measured. The authors illustrate this in the context of 2 case studies in which psychologists need to develop inventories with nonarbitrary metrics. One example comes from social psychology, where researchers have begun using the Implicit Association Test to provide the lay public with feedback about their "hidden biases" via popular Internet Web pages. The other example comes from clinical psychology, where researchers…

Citation impact

685
total citations
FWCI
137.41
Percentile
100%
References
57
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Psychology
  • Psychological research
  • Context (archaeology)
  • Social psychology
  • Test (biology)
  • Arbitrariness
  • Dimension (graph theory)
  • Metric (unit)
No related works found for this paper.