reviewNew England Journal of MedicineSep 4, 2013BRONZE OA

Cystatin C versus Creatinine in Determining Risk Based on Kidney Function

San Francisco VA Medical Center

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Adding the measurement of cystatin C to that of serum creatinine to determine the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improves accuracy, but the effect on detection, staging, and risk classification of chronic kidney disease across diverse populations has not been determined.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis of 11 general-population studies (with 90,750 participants) and 5 studies of cohorts with chronic kidney disease (2960 participants) for whom standardized measurements of serum creatinine and cystatin C were available. We compared the association of the eGFR, as calculated by the measurement of creatinine or cystatin C alone or in combination with creatinine, with the rates of death (13,202 deaths in 15 cohorts), death from cardiovascular causes (3471 in 12 cohorts), and end-stage renal disease (1654 cases in 7 cohorts) and assessed improvement in reclassification with the use of cystatin C.

Citation impact

961
total citations
FWCI
47.65
Percentile
100%
References
58
Citations per year

Authors

12

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Cystatin C
  • Renal function
  • Medicine
  • Creatinine
  • Kidney disease
  • Internal medicine
  • Cystatin
  • Population
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.