Cystatin C versus Creatinine in Determining Risk Based on Kidney Function
San Francisco VA Medical Center
Abstract
Adding the measurement of cystatin C to that of serum creatinine to determine the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improves accuracy, but the effect on detection, staging, and risk classification of chronic kidney disease across diverse populations has not been determined.
We performed a meta-analysis of 11 general-population studies (with 90,750 participants) and 5 studies of cohorts with chronic kidney disease (2960 participants) for whom standardized measurements of serum creatinine and cystatin C were available. We compared the association of the eGFR, as calculated by the measurement of creatinine or cystatin C alone or in combination with creatinine, with the rates of death (13,202 deaths in 15 cohorts), death from cardiovascular causes (3471 in 12 cohorts), and end-stage renal disease (1654 cases in 7 cohorts) and assessed improvement in reclassification with the use of cystatin C.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 47.65
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 58
Authors
12Topics & keywords
- Cystatin C
- Renal function
- Medicine
- Creatinine
- Kidney disease
- Internal medicine
- Cystatin
- Population
- Good health and well-being