reviewPhysical TherapyDec 12, 2007Closed access

Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review

University of Alberta · The University of Sydney · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

Extensive electronic database searches, along with a manual search, were performed.

Results

One hundred five relevant studies were identified. They accounted for 21 scales and their modifications. The majority of scales had not been rigorously developed or tested for validity and reliability. The Jadad Scale presented the best validity and reliability evidence; however, its validity for physical therapy trials has not been supported. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Many scales are used to evaluate the methodological quality of RCTs, but most of these scales have not been adequately developed and have not been adequately tested for validity and reliability. A valid and reliable scale for the assessment of the methodological quality of physical therapy trials needs to be developed.

Citation impact

829
total citations
FWCI
21.81
Percentile
100%
References
212
Citations per year

Authors

6

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Jadad scale
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Reliability (semiconductor)
  • Systematic review
  • Scale (ratio)
  • External validity
  • Validity
  • Internal validity
No related works found for this paper.