Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review
University of Alberta · The University of Sydney · +1 more institution
Abstract
Extensive electronic database searches, along with a manual search, were performed.
One hundred five relevant studies were identified. They accounted for 21 scales and their modifications. The majority of scales had not been rigorously developed or tested for validity and reliability. The Jadad Scale presented the best validity and reliability evidence; however, its validity for physical therapy trials has not been supported. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Many scales are used to evaluate the methodological quality of RCTs, but most of these scales have not been adequately developed and have not been adequately tested for validity and reliability. A valid and reliable scale for the assessment of the methodological quality of physical therapy trials needs to be developed.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 21.81
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 212
Authors
6Topics & keywords
- Jadad scale
- Randomized controlled trial
- Reliability (semiconductor)
- Systematic review
- Scale (ratio)
- External validity
- Validity
- Internal validity