articleAmerican Journal of Political ScienceSep 7, 2004Closed access

Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market

University of Houston · Columbia University

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Why do some parties fail to benefit from patronage in pork‐ridden political systems? This article analyzes the interaction between patronage and partisanship to explain why some incumbents are more likely to benefit from pork politics than others. We explain such differences by focusing on political parties' access to resources (supply side) and voters' dependence on fiscal largesse (demand side). We show how these differences affect the patron's choice of public sector wages and employment. We use subnational level data to show different electoral returns from patronage for the two major political coalitions in Argentina—Peronism and the UCR‐Alianza—and their effect on preferences over public sector wages and…

Citation impact

670
total citations
FWCI
56.58
Percentile
100%
References
35
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Politics
  • Supply side
  • Affect (linguistics)
  • Demand side
  • Economics
  • Business
  • Political economy
  • Labour economics
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Decent work and economic growth
No related works found for this paper.