Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions
The University of Sydney · New South Wales Department of Health · +2 more institutions
Abstract
Public health interventions tend to be complex, programmatic, and context dependent. The evidence for their effectiveness must be sufficiently comprehensive to encompass that complexity. This paper asks whether and to what extent evaluative research on public health interventions can be adequately appraised by applying well established criteria for judging the quality of evidence in clinical practice. It is adduced that these criteria are useful in evaluating some aspects of evidence. However, there are other important aspects of evidence on public health interventions that are not covered by the established criteria. The evaluation of evidence must distinguish between the fidelity of the evaluation process in…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 92.75
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 127
Authors
4- LRLucie RychetnikCorresponding
The University of Sydney, New South Wales Department of Health
- MFM Frommer
Services Australia
- PHP Hawe
RMIT University
- ASA Shiell
RMIT University
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Intervention (counseling)
- Psychological intervention
- Context (archaeology)
- Public health
- Evidence-based practice
- Fidelity
- Evidence-based medicine