reviewJournal of Epidemiology & Community HealthFeb 1, 2002BRONZE OA

Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions

LRLucie RychetnikMFM FrommerPHP HaweASA Shiell

The University of Sydney · New South Wales Department of Health · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Public health interventions tend to be complex, programmatic, and context dependent. The evidence for their effectiveness must be sufficiently comprehensive to encompass that complexity. This paper asks whether and to what extent evaluative research on public health interventions can be adequately appraised by applying well established criteria for judging the quality of evidence in clinical practice. It is adduced that these criteria are useful in evaluating some aspects of evidence. However, there are other important aspects of evidence on public health interventions that are not covered by the established criteria. The evaluation of evidence must distinguish between the fidelity of the evaluation process in…

Citation impact

1,045
total citations
FWCI
92.75
Percentile
100%
References
127
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Intervention (counseling)
  • Psychological intervention
  • Context (archaeology)
  • Public health
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Fidelity
  • Evidence-based medicine
No related works found for this paper.