reviewInternational Journal of EpidemiologyMar 16, 2011Closed access

Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies

MRC Biostatistics Unit

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Mendelian randomization is used to test and estimate the magnitude of a causal effect of a phenotype on an outcome by using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs). Estimates of association from IV analysis are biased in the direction of the confounded, observational association between phenotype and outcome. The magnitude of the bias depends on the F-statistic for the strength of relationship between IVs and phenotype. We seek to develop guidelines for the design and analysis of Mendelian randomization studies to minimize bias.

Methods

IV analysis was performed on simulated and real data to investigate the effect on bias of size of study, number and choice of instruments and method of analysis.

Citation impact

4,112
total citations
FWCI
6.54
Percentile
100%
References
41
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Mendelian randomization
  • Observational study
  • Pooling
  • Statistics
  • Statistic
  • Covariate
  • Econometrics
  • Type I and type II errors
No related works found for this paper.