What do we gain from simplicity versus complexity in species distribution models?
Microsoft (United States) · University of Connecticut · +12 more institutions
Abstract
Species distribution models (SDMs) are widely used to explain and predict species ranges and environmental niches. They are most commonly constructed by inferring species' occurrence–environment relationships using statistical and machine‐learning methods. The variety of methods that can be used to construct SDMs (e.g. generalized linear/additive models, tree‐based models, maximum entropy, etc.), and the variety of ways that such models can be implemented, permits substantial flexibility in SDM complexity. Building models with an appropriate amount of complexity for the study objectives is critical for robust inference. We characterize complexity as the shape of the inferred occurrence–environment…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 36.91
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 119
Authors
10- CMCory MerowCorresponding
Microsoft (United States), University of Connecticut, Microsoft Research (United Kingdom), Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
- MJMathew J. Smith
Microsoft (United States), Microsoft Research (United Kingdom)
- TCThomas C. Edwards
Utah State University, United States Geological Survey, Utah Geological Survey
- AGAntoine Guisan
University of Lausanne
- SMSean M. McMahon
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
Topics & keywords
- Computer science
- Variety (cybernetics)
- Flexibility (engineering)
- Model selection
- Inference
- Principle of maximum entropy
- Computational model
- Machine learning
- Life in Land