Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
University of Dundee · Scottish School of Primary Care · +6 more institutions
Abstract
To identify interventions designed to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials, and to quantify their effect on trial participation.
Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Methodology Review Group Specialised Register in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, C2-SPECTR, the National Research Register and PubMed. Most searches were undertaken up to 2010; no language restrictions were applied. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials, including those recruiting to hypothetical studies. Studies on retention strategies, examining ways to increase questionnaire response or evaluating the use of incentives for clinicians were excluded. The study population included any potential trial participant (eg, patient, clinician and member of the public), or individual or group of individuals responsible for trial recruitment (eg, clinicians, researchers and recruitment sites). Two authors independently screened identified studies for eligibility.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 46.24
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 77
Authors
12Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Meta-analysis
- Systematic review
- Cochrane collaboration
- Randomized controlled trial
- Alternative medicine
- MEDLINE
- Internal medicine