reviewPsychological MethodsMar 1, 2009Closed access

Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations.

University of Windsor

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Reporting practices in 194 confirmatory factor analysis studies (1,409 factor models) published in American Psychological Association journals from 1998 to 2006 were reviewed and compared with established reporting guidelines. Three research questions were addressed: (a) how do actual reporting practices compare with published guidelines? (b) how do researchers report model fit in light of divergent perspectives on the use of ancillary fit indices (e.g., L.-T. Hu & P. M. Bentler, 1999; H. W. Marsh, K.-T., Hau, & Z. Wen, 2004)? and (c) are fit measures that support hypothesized models reported more often than fit measures that are less favorable? Results indicate some positive findings with respect to reporting…

Citation impact

2,236
total citations
FWCI
29.30
Percentile
100%
References
87
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Confirmatory factor analysis
  • Checklist
  • Psychology
  • Normality
  • Structural equation modeling
  • Test (biology)
  • Statistics
  • Applied psychology
No related works found for this paper.