STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2
Cork University Hospital · University College Cork · +1 more institution
Abstract
We reviewed the 2008 STOPP/START criteria to add new evidence-based criteria and remove any obsolete criteria. A thorough literature review was performed to reassess the evidence base of the 2008 criteria and the proposed new criteria. Nineteen experts from 13 European countries reviewed a new draft of STOPP & START criteria including proposed new criteria. These experts were also asked to propose additional criteria they considered important to include in the revised STOPP & START criteria and to highlight any criteria from the 2008 list they considered less important or lacking an evidence base. The revised list of criteria was then validated using the Delphi consensus methodology.
The expert panel agreed a final list of 114 criteria after two Delphi validation rounds, i.e. 80 STOPP criteria and 34 START criteria. This represents an overall 31% increase in STOPP/START criteria compared with version 1. Several new STOPP categories were created in version 2, namely antiplatelet/anticoagulant drugs, drugs affecting, or affected by, renal function and drugs that increase anticholinergic burden; new START categories include urogenital system drugs, analgesics and vaccines.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 70.69
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 16
Authors
6Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Medical prescription
- Delphi method
- Beers Criteria
- Older people
- Family medicine
- Gerontology
- Nursing
- Good health and well-being