articleThe American StatisticianOct 11, 2006Closed access

The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant

University of California, Irvine

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

It is common to summarize statistical comparisons by declarations of statistical significance or nonsignificance. Here we discuss one problem with such declarations, namely that changes in statistical significance are often not themselves statistically significant. By this, we are not merely making the commonplace observation that any particular threshold is arbitrary—for example, only a small change is required to move an estimate from a 5.1% significance level to 4.9%, thus moving it into statistical significance. Rather, we are pointing out that even large changes in significance levels can correspond to small, nonsignificant changes in the underlying quantities.The error we describe is conceptually…

Citation impact

1,211
total citations
FWCI
11.65
Percentile
100%
References
10
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Statistical significance
  • Null hypothesis
  • Statistical hypothesis testing
  • Null (SQL)
  • Statistics
  • Interpretation (philosophy)
  • Statistical analysis
  • Psychology
No related works found for this paper.