The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant
University of California, Irvine
Indexed incrossref
Abstract
It is common to summarize statistical comparisons by declarations of statistical significance or nonsignificance. Here we discuss one problem with such declarations, namely that changes in statistical significance are often not themselves statistically significant. By this, we are not merely making the commonplace observation that any particular threshold is arbitrary—for example, only a small change is required to move an estimate from a 5.1% significance level to 4.9%, thus moving it into statistical significance. Rather, we are pointing out that even large changes in significance levels can correspond to small, nonsignificant changes in the underlying quantities.The error we describe is conceptually…
Citation impact
1,211
total citations
- FWCI
- 11.65
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 10
Citations per year
Authors
2Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Statistical significance
- Null hypothesis
- Statistical hypothesis testing
- Null (SQL)
- Statistics
- Interpretation (philosophy)
- Statistical analysis
- Psychology
No related works found for this paper.