articleNew England Journal of MedicineOct 17, 2002BRONZE OA

Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Study Comparing Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radical Mastectomy for Early Breast Cancer

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · European Institute of Oncology

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

We conducted 20 years of follow-up of women enrolled in a randomized trial to compare the efficacy of radical (Halsted) mastectomy with that of breast-conserving surgery.

Methods

From 1973 to 1980, 701 women with breast cancers measuring no more than 2 cm in diameter were randomly assigned to undergo radical mastectomy (349 patients) or breast-conserving surgery (quadrantectomy) followed by radiotherapy to the ipsilateral mammary tissue (352 patients). After 1976, patients in both groups who had positive axillary nodes also received adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil.

Citation impact

4,431
total citations
FWCI
35.00
Percentile
100%
References
19
Citations per year

Authors

8

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Quadrantectomy
  • Breast cancer
  • Breast-conserving surgery
  • Mastectomy
  • Modified Radical Mastectomy
  • Radiation therapy
  • Radical mastectomy
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding