articleNew England Journal of MedicineMay 19, 2004Closed access

Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy with or without an Implantable Defibrillator in Advanced Chronic Heart Failure

University of Colorado Health · University of Southern California · +6 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

We tested the hypothesis that prophylactic cardiac-resynchronization therapy in the form of biventricular stimulation with a pacemaker with or without a defibrillator would reduce the risk of death and hospitalization among patients with advanced chronic heart failure and intraventricular conduction delays.

Methods

A total of 1520 patients who had advanced heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV) due to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathies and a QRS interval of at least 120 msec were randomly assigned in a 1:2:2 ratio to receive optimal pharmacologic therapy (diuretics, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, and spironolactone) alone or in combination with cardiac-resynchronization therapy with either a pacemaker or a pacemaker-defibrillator. The primary composite end point was the time to death from or hospitalization for any cause.

Citation impact

5,810
total citations
FWCI
216.68
Percentile
100%
References
23
Citations per year

Authors

12

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Heart failure
  • Cardiology
  • Internal medicine
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Ejection fraction
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.