articleJournal of Clinical OncologyJul 18, 2007BRONZE OA

Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group

University of Leeds · St James's University Hospital

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

The United Kingdom Medical Research Council Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer (UK MRC CLASICC; clinical trials number ISRCTN 74883561) trial study comparing conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with cancer of the colon and rectum. The randomization ratio was 2:1 in favor of laparoscopic surgery. Long-term outcomes (3-year overall survival [OS], disease-free survival [DFS], local recurrence, and quality of life [QoL]) have now been determined on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results

Seven hundred ninety-four patients were recruited (526 laparoscopic and 268 open). Overall, there were no differences in the long-term outcomes. The differences in survival rates were OS of 1.8% (95% CI, -5.2% to 8.8%; P = .55), DFS of -1.4% (95% CI, -9.5% to 6.7%; P = .70), local recurrence of -0.8% (95% CI, -5.7% to 4.2%; P = .76), and QoL (P > .01 for all scales). Higher positivity of the circumferential resection margin was reported after laparoscopic anterior resection (AR), but it did not translate into an increased incidence of local recurrence.

Citation impact

1,509
total citations
FWCI
39.18
Percentile
100%
References
22
Citations per year

Authors

8

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Randomization
  • Surgery
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Resection margin
  • Context (archaeology)
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding