Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group
University of Leeds · St James's University Hospital
Abstract
The United Kingdom Medical Research Council Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer (UK MRC CLASICC; clinical trials number ISRCTN 74883561) trial study comparing conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with cancer of the colon and rectum. The randomization ratio was 2:1 in favor of laparoscopic surgery. Long-term outcomes (3-year overall survival [OS], disease-free survival [DFS], local recurrence, and quality of life [QoL]) have now been determined on an intention-to-treat basis.
Seven hundred ninety-four patients were recruited (526 laparoscopic and 268 open). Overall, there were no differences in the long-term outcomes. The differences in survival rates were OS of 1.8% (95% CI, -5.2% to 8.8%; P = .55), DFS of -1.4% (95% CI, -9.5% to 6.7%; P = .70), local recurrence of -0.8% (95% CI, -5.7% to 4.2%; P = .76), and QoL (P > .01 for all scales). Higher positivity of the circumferential resection margin was reported after laparoscopic anterior resection (AR), but it did not translate into an increased incidence of local recurrence.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 39.18
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 22
Authors
8- DJDavid JayneCorresponding
University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital
- PJP J Guillou
University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital
- HTH. Thorpe
University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital
- PQPhilip Quirke
University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital
- JCJoanne Copeland
University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Colorectal cancer
- Randomized controlled trial
- Randomization
- Surgery
- Laparoscopic surgery
- Resection margin
- Context (archaeology)
- Good health and well-being