Measures of Multimorbidity and Morbidity Burden for Use in Primary Care and Community Settings: A Systematic Review and Guide
University of Bristol · Primary Health Care
Abstract
Studies were identified using searches in MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to December 2009 and bibliographies.
Included were 194 articles describing 17 different measures. Commonly used measures included disease counts (n = 98), Chronic Disease Score (CDS)/RxRisk (n = 17), Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) System (n = 25), the Charlson index (n = 38), the Cumulative Index Illness Rating Scale (CIRS; n = 10) and the Duke Severity of Illness Checklist (DUSOI; n = 6). Studies that compared measures suggest their predictive validity for the same outcome differs only slightly. Evidence is strongest for the ACG System, Charlson index, or disease counts in relation to care utilization; for the ACG System in relation to costs; for Charlson index in relation to mortality; and for disease counts or Charlson index in relation to quality of life. Simple counts of diseases or medications perform almost as well as complex measures in predicting most outcomes. Combining measures can improve validity.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 30.28
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 73
Authors
5Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Checklist
- MEDLINE
- Disease
- Quality of life (healthcare)
- Index (typography)
- Severity of illness
- Emergency medicine
- Good health and well-being