Abstract
This article advances a simple conception of test validity: A test is valid for measuring an attribute if (a) the attribute exists and (b) variations in the attribute causally produce variation in the measurement outcomes. This conception is shown to diverge from current validity theory in several respects. In particular, the emphasis in the proposed conception is on ontology, reference, and causality, whereas current validity theory focuses on epistemology, meaning, and correlation. It is argued that the proposed conception is not only simpler but also theoretically superior to the position taken in the existing literature. Further, it has clear theoretical and practical implications for validation research.…
Citation impact
1,671
total citations
- FWCI
- 38.32
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 71
Citations per year
Authors
3Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Causality (physics)
- Meaning (existential)
- External validity
- Psychology
- Test (biology)
- Cognitive psychology
- Epistemology
- Criterion validity
No related works found for this paper.