Efficacy of climate forcings
Goddard Institute for Space Studies · Earth Island Institute · +9 more institutions
Abstract
We use a global climate model to compare the effectiveness of many climate forcing agents for producing climate change. We find a substantial range in the “efficacy” of different forcings, where the efficacy is the global temperature response per unit forcing relative to the response to CO 2 forcing. Anthropogenic CH 4 has efficacy ∼110%, which increases to ∼145% when its indirect effects on stratospheric H 2 O and tropospheric O 3 are included, yielding an effective climate forcing of ∼0.8 W/m 2 for the period 1750–2000 and making CH 4 the largest anthropogenic climate forcing other than CO 2 . Black carbon (BC) aerosols from biomass burning have a calculated efficacy ∼58%, while fossil fuel BC has an…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 52.05
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 168
Authors
45- JEJames E. HansenCorresponding
Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Earth Island Institute, Columbia University
- MSM. Sato
Earth Island Institute, Columbia University
- RRReto Rüedy
Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies (United States)
- LNLarissa Nazarenko
Earth Island Institute, Columbia University
- AAAndrew A. Lacis
Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Columbia University
Topics & keywords
- Environmental science
- Forcing (mathematics)
- Climatology
- Cloud forcing
- Radiative forcing
- Atmospheric sciences
- Greenhouse gas
- Climate change
- Climate action