Two-Year Outcomes after Conventional or Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Radboud University Nijmegen · Radboud University Medical Center · +6 more institutions
Abstract
Two randomized trials have shown better outcomes with elective endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms than with conventional open repair in the first month after the procedure. We investigated whether this advantage is sustained beyond the perioperative period.
We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing open repair with endovascular repair in 351 patients who had received a diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm of at least 5 cm in diameter and who were considered suitable candidates for both techniques. Survival after randomization was calculated with the use of Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared with the use of the log-rank test on an intention-to-treat-basis.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 61.99
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 19
Authors
9- JDJan D. BlankensteijnCorresponding
Radboud University Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center
- SDS.E.C.A. de Jong
Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Radboud University Nijmegen
- MPMonique Prinssen
Center for Vascular Biology Research
- ACArie C. van der Ham
Sint Franciscus Gasthuis
- JBJaap Buth
Catharina Ziekenhuis, Radboud University Nijmegen
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Confidence interval
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm
- Surgery
- Perioperative
- Randomization
- Randomized controlled trial
- Aneurysm
- Good health and well-being