articleEpilepsiaMar 20, 2010Closed access

Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy

Stanford University · Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · +19 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

Participants were adults with medically refractory partial seizures, including secondarily generalized seizures. Half received stimulation and half no stimulation during a 3-month blinded phase; then all received unblinded stimulation.

Results

One hundred ten participants were randomized. Baseline monthly median seizure frequency was 19.5. In the last month of the blinded phase the stimulated group had a 29% greater reduction in seizures compared with the control group, as estimated by a generalized estimating equations (GEE) model (p = 0.002). Unadjusted median declines at the end of the blinded phase were 14.5% in the control group and 40.4% in the stimulated group. Complex partial and "most severe" seizures were significantly reduced by stimulation. By 2 years, there was a 56% median percent reduction in seizure frequency; 54% of patients had a seizure reduction of at least 50%, and 14 patients were seizure-free for at least 6 months. Five deaths occurred and none were from implantation or stimulation. No participant had symptomatic hemorrhage or brain infection. Two participants had acute, transient stimulation-associated seizures. Cognition and mood showed no group differences, but participants in the stimulated group were more likely to report depression or memory problems as adverse events.

Citation impact

1,909
total citations
FWCI
57.90
Percentile
100%
References
30
Citations per year

Authors

42

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Thalamus
  • Stimulation
  • Epilepsy
  • Deep brain stimulation
  • Anesthesia
  • Medicine
  • Adverse effect
  • Thalamic stimulator
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding