Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Tremelimumab With Standard-of-Care Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma
Radboud University Nijmegen · Westmead Institute · +3 more institutions
Abstract
In all, 655 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. The test statistic crossed the prespecified futility boundary at second interim analysis after 340 deaths, but survival follow-up continued. At final analysis with 534 events, median OS by intent to treat was 12.6 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 14.3) for tremelimumab and 10.7 months (95% CI, 9.36 to 11.96) for chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.88; P = .127). Objective response rates were similar in the two arms: 10.7% in the tremelimumab arm and 9.8% in the chemotherapy arm. However, response duration (measured from date of random assignment) was significantly longer after tremelimumab (35.8 v 13.7 months; P = .0011). Diarrhea, pruritus, and rash were the most common treatment-related adverse events in the tremelimumab arm; 7.4% had endocrine toxicities. Seven deaths in the tremelimumab arm and one in the chemotherapy arm were considered treatment related by either investigators or sponsor.
This study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant survival advantage of treatment with tremelimumab over standard-of-care chemotherapy in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 49.39
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 14
Authors
24- ARAntoni RibasCorresponding
Radboud University Nijmegen, Westmead Institute
- RKRichard Kefford
Radboud University Nijmegen, Westmead Institute
- MMMargaret Marshall
Radboud University Nijmegen, Westmead Institute
- CJCornelis J.A. Punt
Radboud University Nijmegen, Westmead Institute
- JBJohn B.A.G. Haanen
Radboud University Nijmegen, Westmead Institute
Topics & keywords
- Tremelimumab
- Medicine
- Dacarbazine
- Internal medicine
- Rash
- Hazard ratio
- Chemotherapy
- Temozolomide
- Good health and well-being