Comparison of 2 Frailty Indexes for Prediction of Falls, Disability, Fractures, and Death in Older Women
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Abstract
Frailty, as defined by the index derived from the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS index), predicts risk of adverse outcomes in older adults. Use of this index, however, is impractical in clinical practice.
We conducted a prospective cohort study in 6701 women 69 years or older to compare the predictive validity of a simple frailty index with the components of weight loss, inability to rise from a chair 5 times without using arms, and reduced energy level (Study of Osteoporotic Fractures [SOF index]) with that of the CHS index with the components of unintentional weight loss, poor grip strength, reduced energy level, slow walking speed, and low level of physical activity. Women were classified as robust, of intermediate status, or frail using each index. Falls were reported every 4 months for 1 year. Disability (> or =1 new impairment in performing instrumental activities of daily living) was ascertained at 4(1/2) years, and fractures and deaths were ascertained during 9 years of follow-up. Area under the curve (AUC) statistics from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and -2 log likelihood statistics were compared for models containing the CHS index vs the SOF index.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 16.46
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 41
Authors
1Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Hazard ratio
- Odds ratio
- Index (typography)
- Grip strength
- Prospective cohort study
- Cohort study
- Hip fracture