articleAmerican Journal of EpidemiologyJan 30, 2013BRONZE OA

The Table 2 Fallacy: Presenting and Interpreting Confounder and Modifier Coefficients

Duke Medical Center · Duke University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

It is common to present multiple adjusted effect estimates from a single model in a single table. For example, a table might show odds ratios for one or more exposures and also for several confounders from a single logistic regression. This can lead to mistaken interpretations of these estimates. We use causal diagrams to display the sources of the problems. Presentation of exposure and confounder effect estimates from a single model may lead to several interpretative difficulties, inviting confusion of direct-effect estimates with total-effect estimates for covariates in the model. These effect estimates may also be confounded even though the effect estimate for the main exposure is not confounded.…

Citation impact

1,237
total citations
FWCI
11.61
Percentile
100%
References
30
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Covariate
  • Confounding
  • Statistics
  • Fallacy
  • Econometrics
  • Logistic regression
  • Mathematics
No related works found for this paper.

Funding