Statistical phylogeography: methods of evaluating and minimizing inference errors
Washington University in St. Louis
Abstract
Nested clade phylogeographical analysis (NCPA) has become a common tool in intraspecific phylogeography. To evaluate the validity of its inferences, NCPA was applied to actual data sets with 150 strong a priori expectations, the majority of which had not been analysed previously by NCPA. NCPA did well overall, but it sometimes failed to detect an expected event and less commonly resulted in a false positive. An examination of these errors suggested some alterations in the NCPA inference key, and these modifications reduce the incidence of false positives at the cost of a slight reduction in power. Moreover, NCPA does equally well in inferring events regardless of the presence or absence of other, unrelated…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 43.28
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 68
Authors
1Topics & keywords
- Inference
- Statistical hypothesis testing
- False positive paradox
- Statistical inference
- Biology
- A priori and a posteriori
- Statistical power
- Frequentist inference