A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
The minimal important difference (MID) is a phrase with instant appeal in a field struggling to interpret health-related quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes. The terminology can be confusing, with several terms differing only slightly in definition (e.g., minimal clinically important difference, clinically important difference, minimally detectable difference, the subjectively significant difference), and others that seem similar despite having quite different meanings (minimally detectable difference versus minimum detectable change). Often, nuances of definition are of little consequence in the way that these quantities are estimated and used. Four methods are commonly employed to estimate…
Citation impact
652
total citations
- FWCI
- 62.55
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 67
Citations per year
Authors
1Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Terminology
- Context (archaeology)
- Minimal clinically important difference
- Phrase
- Appeal
- Population
- Medicine
- Quality of life (healthcare)
No related works found for this paper.