A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods

University of Sydney

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

The minimal important difference (MID) is a phrase with instant appeal in a field struggling to interpret health-related quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes. The terminology can be confusing, with several terms differing only slightly in definition (e.g., minimal clinically important difference, clinically important difference, minimally detectable difference, the subjectively significant difference), and others that seem similar despite having quite different meanings (minimally detectable difference versus minimum detectable change). Often, nuances of definition are of little consequence in the way that these quantities are estimated and used. Four methods are commonly employed to estimate…

Citation impact

652
total citations
FWCI
62.55
Percentile
100%
References
67
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Terminology
  • Context (archaeology)
  • Minimal clinically important difference
  • Phrase
  • Appeal
  • Population
  • Medicine
  • Quality of life (healthcare)
No related works found for this paper.