reviewJournal of Applied PsychologyJan 1, 2010Closed access

Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work.

Pennsylvania State University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

As corporate scandals proliferate, practitioners and researchers alike need a cumulative, quantitative understanding of the antecedents associated with unethical decisions in organizations. In this meta-analysis, the authors draw from over 30 years of research and multiple literatures to examine individual ("bad apple"), moral issue ("bad case"), and organizational environment ("bad barrel") antecedents of unethical choice. Findings provide empirical support for several foundational theories and paint a clearer picture of relationships characterized by mixed results. Structural equation modeling revealed the complexity (multidetermined nature) of unethical choice, as well as a need for research that…

Citation impact

1,649
total citations
FWCI
138.12
Percentile
100%
References
323
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Moderation
  • Psychology
  • Perspective (graphical)
  • Social psychology
  • Empirical research
  • Foundation (evidence)
  • Organizational behavior
  • Impulse (physics)
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.