reviewJournal of the American College of CardiologyAug 28, 2013HYBRID OA

Anatomic Versus Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · University of Missouri–Kansas City · +23 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Angiographic severity of coronary artery stenosis has historically been the primary guide to revascularization or medical management of coronary artery disease. However, physiologic severity defined by coronary pressure and/or flow has resurged into clinical prominence as a potential, fundamental change from anatomically to physiologically guided management. This review addresses clinical coronary physiology-pressure and flow-as clinical tools for treating patients. We clarify the basic concepts that hold true for whatever technology measures coronary physiology directly and reliably, here focusing on positron emission tomography and its interplay with intracoronary measurements.

Citation impact

562
total citations
FWCI
46.43
Percentile
100%
References
47
Citations per year

Authors

28

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Fractional flow reserve
  • Cardiology
  • Revascularization
  • Coronary flow reserve
  • Internal medicine
  • Stenosis
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding