articleNew England Journal of MedicineFeb 9, 2011BRONZE OA

A Randomized Trial of Prenatal versus Postnatal Repair of Myelomeningocele

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · George Washington University · +5 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Prenatal repair of myelomeningocele, the most common form of spina bifida, may result in better neurologic function than repair deferred until after delivery. We compared outcomes of in utero repair with standard postnatal repair.

Methods

We randomly assigned eligible women to undergo either prenatal surgery before 26 weeks of gestation or standard postnatal repair. One primary outcome was a composite of fetal or neonatal death or the need for placement of a cerebrospinal fluid shunt by the age of 12 months. Another primary outcome at 30 months was a composite of mental development and motor function.

Citation impact

2,233
total citations
FWCI
118.20
Percentile
100%
References
31
Citations per year

Authors

14

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Fetal surgery
  • In utero
  • Spina bifida
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Surgery
  • Relative risk
  • Confidence interval
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.