A Randomized Trial of Prenatal versus Postnatal Repair of Myelomeningocele
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · George Washington University · +5 more institutions
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Background
Prenatal repair of myelomeningocele, the most common form of spina bifida, may result in better neurologic function than repair deferred until after delivery. We compared outcomes of in utero repair with standard postnatal repair.
Methods
We randomly assigned eligible women to undergo either prenatal surgery before 26 weeks of gestation or standard postnatal repair. One primary outcome was a composite of fetal or neonatal death or the need for placement of a cerebrospinal fluid shunt by the age of 12 months. Another primary outcome at 30 months was a composite of mental development and motor function.
Citation impact
2,233
total citations
- FWCI
- 118.20
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 31
Citations per year
Authors
14Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Medicine
- Fetal surgery
- In utero
- Spina bifida
- Randomized controlled trial
- Surgery
- Relative risk
- Confidence interval
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.