articleIntensive Care MedicineAug 16, 2005HYBRID OA

SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description

Vienna General Hospital · Hospital Santo António dos Capuchos · +9 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

Risk adjustment systems now in use were developed more than a decade ago and lack prognostic performance. Objective of the SAPS 3 study was to collect data about risk factors and outcomes in a heterogeneous cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, in order to develop a new, improved model for risk adjustment.

Design

Prospective multicentre, multinational cohort study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: A total of 19,577 patients consecutively admitted to 307 ICUs from 14 October to 15 December 2002. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Data were collected at ICU admission, on days 1, 2 and 3, and the last day of the ICU stay. Data included sociodemographics, chronic conditions, diagnostic information, physiological derangement at ICU admission, number and severity of organ dysfunctions, length of ICU and hospital stay, and vital status at ICU and hospital discharge. Data reliability was tested with use of kappa statistics and intraclass-correlation coefficients, which were >0.85 for the majority of variables. Completeness of the data was also satisfactory, with 1 [0-3] SAPS II parameter missing per patient. Prognostic performance of the SAPS II was poor, with significant differences between observed and expected mortality rates for the overall cohort and four (of seven) defined regions, and poor calibration for most tested subgroups.

Citation impact

698
total citations
FWCI
11.70
Percentile
100%
References
44
Citations per year

Authors

11

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Intensive care unit
  • Cohort
  • SAPS II
  • Anesthesiology
  • Emergency medicine
  • Intensive care
  • Intensive care medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding