reviewJournal of Sports SciencesJan 1, 2002Closed access

Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis

California State University Los Angeles

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

The literature related to Borg's ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) scale has revealed inconsistencies about the strength of the relationship between ratings of perceived exertion and various physiological criterion measures, such as heart rate, blood lactate concentration, percent maximal oxygen uptake (%VO2max), oxygen uptake (VO2), ventilation and respiration rate. Using sex of participants, fitness, type of RPE scale used, type of exercise, exercise protocol, RPE mode and study quality, we undertook a meta-analysis to determine the strength of the relationship between RPE scores and the six aforementioned physiological measures. The weighted mean validity coefficients were 0.62 for heart rate, 0.57 for…

Citation impact

811
total citations
FWCI
5.15
Percentile
100%
References
142
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Heart rate
  • Perceived exertion
  • VO2 max
  • Ventilation (architecture)
  • Exertion
  • Blood lactate
  • Work rate
  • Physical therapy
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.