Two Is Not Always Better Than One
Tilburg University · Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Abstract
Over the past two decades, there has been an upsurge in theoretical frameworks alluding to the existence of two different processing systems that supposedly operate according to different rules. This article critically examines the scientific advance offered by these theories (in particular advances in the domains of reasoning, decision making, and social cognition) and questions their theoretical coherence as well as the evidence for their existence. We scrutinize the conceptual underpinnings of two-system models and explicate the assumptions underlying these models to see whether they are reasonable. We also evaluate the empirical paradigms used to validate two-system models and ponder about their…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 16.57
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 130
Authors
2Topics & keywords
- Popularity
- Appeal
- Explanatory power
- Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy)
- Epistemology
- Empirical evidence
- Predictive power
- Empirical research
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions