articlePerspectives on Psychological ScienceNov 1, 2009Closed access

Two Is Not Always Better Than One

Tilburg University · Hebrew University of Jerusalem

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Over the past two decades, there has been an upsurge in theoretical frameworks alluding to the existence of two different processing systems that supposedly operate according to different rules. This article critically examines the scientific advance offered by these theories (in particular advances in the domains of reasoning, decision making, and social cognition) and questions their theoretical coherence as well as the evidence for their existence. We scrutinize the conceptual underpinnings of two-system models and explicate the assumptions underlying these models to see whether they are reasonable. We also evaluate the empirical paradigms used to validate two-system models and ponder about their…

Citation impact

690
total citations
FWCI
16.57
Percentile
100%
References
130
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Popularity
  • Appeal
  • Explanatory power
  • Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy)
  • Epistemology
  • Empirical evidence
  • Predictive power
  • Empirical research
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.