articleNew England Journal of MedicineMay 11, 2011BRONZE OA

Pneumatic Dilation versus Laparoscopic Heller's Myotomy for Idiopathic Achalasia

Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · KU Leuven · +6 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Many experts consider laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) to be superior to pneumatic dilation for the treatment of achalasia, and LHM is increasingly considered to be the treatment of choice for this disorder.

Methods

We randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed achalasia to pneumatic dilation or LHM with Dor's fundoplication. Symptoms, including weight loss, dysphagia, retrosternal pain, and regurgitation, were assessed with the use of the Eckardt score (which ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more pronounced symptoms). The primary outcome was therapeutic success (a drop in the Eckardt score to ≤3) at the yearly follow-up assessment. The secondary outcomes included the need for retreatment, pressure at the lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal emptying on a timed barium esophagogram, quality of life, and the rate of complications.

Citation impact

849
total citations
FWCI
45.09
Percentile
100%
References
32
Citations per year

Authors

15

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Achalasia
  • Dysphagia
  • Myotomy
  • Surgery
  • Confidence interval
  • Heller myotomy
  • Dilation (metric space)
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.