Pneumatic Dilation versus Laparoscopic Heller's Myotomy for Idiopathic Achalasia
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · KU Leuven · +6 more institutions
Abstract
Many experts consider laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) to be superior to pneumatic dilation for the treatment of achalasia, and LHM is increasingly considered to be the treatment of choice for this disorder.
We randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed achalasia to pneumatic dilation or LHM with Dor's fundoplication. Symptoms, including weight loss, dysphagia, retrosternal pain, and regurgitation, were assessed with the use of the Eckardt score (which ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more pronounced symptoms). The primary outcome was therapeutic success (a drop in the Eckardt score to ≤3) at the yearly follow-up assessment. The secondary outcomes included the need for retreatment, pressure at the lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal emptying on a timed barium esophagogram, quality of life, and the rate of complications.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 45.09
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 32
Authors
15Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Achalasia
- Dysphagia
- Myotomy
- Surgery
- Confidence interval
- Heller myotomy
- Dilation (metric space)
- Good health and well-being