Results of the CONFIRM Phase III Trial Comparing Fulvestrant 250 mg With Fulvestrant 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Regional Clinical Hospital named after II Mechnikov
Abstract
PFS was significantly longer for fulvestrant 500 mg (n = 362) than 250 mg (n = 374) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.94; P = .006), corresponding to a 20% reduction in risk of progression. Objective response rate was similar for fulvestrant 500 mg and 250 mg (9.1% v 10.2%, respectively). CBR was 45.6% for fulvestrant 500 mg and 39.6% for fulvestrant 250 mg. DoCB and OS were 16.6 and 25.1 months, respectively, for the 500-mg group, whereas DoCB and OS were 13.9 and 22.8 months, respectively, in the 250-mg group. Fulvestrant 500 mg was well tolerated with no dose-dependent adverse events. QOL was similar for both arms.
Fulvestrant 500 mg was associated with a statistically significant increase in PFS and not associated with increased toxicity, corresponding to a clinically meaningful improvement in benefit versus risk compared with fulvestrant 250 mg.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 34.25
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 15
Authors
15- ADAngelo Di LeoCorresponding
Regional Clinical Hospital named after II Mechnikov
- GJGuy Jérusalem
Regional Clinical Hospital named after II Mechnikov
- LPLuboš Petruželka
Regional Clinical Hospital named after II Mechnikov
- RTRoberto Torres
Regional Clinical Hospital named after II Mechnikov
- IBIgor Bondarenko
Regional Clinical Hospital named after II Mechnikov
Topics & keywords
- Fulvestrant
- Medicine
- Hazard ratio
- Internal medicine
- Adverse effect
- Cancer
- Metastatic breast cancer
- Oncology
- Good health and well-being