articleNew England Journal of MedicineFeb 20, 2008BRONZE OA

Surgical versus Nonsurgical Therapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · +9 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Surgery for spinal stenosis is widely performed, but its effectiveness as compared with nonsurgical treatment has not been shown in controlled trials.

Methods

Surgical candidates with a history of at least 12 weeks of symptoms and spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis (as confirmed on imaging) were enrolled in either a randomized cohort or an observational cohort at 13 U.S. spine clinics. Treatment was decompressive surgery or usual nonsurgical care. The primary outcomes were measures of bodily pain and physical function on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) and the modified Oswestry Disability Index at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 and 2 years.

Citation impact

1,221
total citations
FWCI
40.30
Percentile
100%
References
38
Citations per year

Authors

14

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Oswestry Disability Index
  • Lumbar spinal stenosis
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Surgery
  • Cohort
  • Spinal stenosis
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.