Health Outcomes of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure versus Oral Appliance Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Woolcock Institute of Medical Research · National Health and Medical Research Council · +5 more institutions
Abstract
To compare health effects after 1 month of optimal CPAP and MAD therapy in OSA.
In this randomized crossover trial, we compared the effects of 1 month each of CPAP and MAD treatment on cardiovascular and neurobehavioral outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiovascular (24-h blood pressure, arterial stiffness), neurobehavioral (subjective sleepiness, driving simulator performance), and quality of life (Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, Short Form-36) were compared between treatments. Our primary outcome was 24-hour mean arterial pressure. A total of 126 patients with moderate-severe OSA (apnea hypopnea index [AHI], 25.6 [SD 12.3]) were randomly assigned to a treatment order and 108 completed the trial with both devices. CPAP was more efficacious than MAD in reducing AHI (CPAP AHI, 4.5 ± 6.6/h; MAD AHI, 11.1 ± 12.1/h; P
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 28.53
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 60
Authors
8- CLCraig L. PhillipsCorresponding
Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, National Health and Medical Research Council
- RRRonald R. Grunstein
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, National Health and Medical Research Council
- MAM. Ali Darendeliler
The University of Sydney, Sydney Dental Hospital
- ASAnastasia S. Mihailidou
The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital
- VKVasantha K. Srinivasan
The University of Sydney, Sydney Dental Hospital
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Continuous positive airway pressure
- Obstructive sleep apnea
- Oral appliance
- Anesthesia
- Randomized controlled trial
- Crossover study
- Apnea
- Good health and well-being