reviewJournal of Consumer ResearchSep 1, 2003Closed access

A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research

Arizona State University · Indiana University Bloomington

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

A review of the literature suggests that few studies use formative indicator measurement models, even though they should. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to (a) discuss the distinction between formative and reflective measurement models, (b) develop a set of conceptual criteria that can be used to determine whether a construct should be modeled as having formative or reflective indicators, (c) review the marketing literature to obtain an estimate of the extent of measurement model misspecification in the field, (d) estimate the extent to which measurement model misspecification biases estimates of the relationships between constructs using a Monte Carlo simulation, and (e) provide recommendations…

Citation impact

5,579
total citations
FWCI
123.79
Percentile
100%
References
54
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Formative assessment
  • Construct (python library)
  • Conceptual model
  • Econometrics
  • Set (abstract data type)
  • Computer science
  • Field (mathematics)
  • Statistics
No related works found for this paper.