A Systematic Review of the Job-stress Intervention Evaluation Literature, 1990–2005

Victorian Health Promotion Foundation · The University of Melbourne · +4 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Ninety reports of systematic evaluations of job-stress interventions were rated in terms of the degree of systems approach used. A high rating was defined as both organizationally and individually focused, versus moderate (organizational only), and low (individual only). Studies using high-rated approaches represent a growing proportion of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature. Individual-focused, low-rated approaches are effective at the individual level, favorably affecting individual-level outcomes, but tend not to have favorable impacts at the organizational level. Organizationally-focused high- and moderate-rated approaches are beneficial at both individual and organizational levels. Further…

Citation impact

698
total citations
FWCI
36.68
Percentile
100%
References
77
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Psychological intervention
  • Intervention (counseling)
  • Job stress
  • Psychology
  • Systematic review
  • Applied psychology
  • Job performance
  • Occupational stress
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Decent work and economic growth
No related works found for this paper.