A Systematic Review of the Job-stress Intervention Evaluation Literature, 1990–2005
Victorian Health Promotion Foundation · The University of Melbourne · +4 more institutions
Abstract
Ninety reports of systematic evaluations of job-stress interventions were rated in terms of the degree of systems approach used. A high rating was defined as both organizationally and individually focused, versus moderate (organizational only), and low (individual only). Studies using high-rated approaches represent a growing proportion of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature. Individual-focused, low-rated approaches are effective at the individual level, favorably affecting individual-level outcomes, but tend not to have favorable impacts at the organizational level. Organizationally-focused high- and moderate-rated approaches are beneficial at both individual and organizational levels. Further…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 36.68
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 77
Authors
5- ADAnthony D. LaMontagneCorresponding
Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, The University of Melbourne
- TKTessa Keegel
The Alfred Hospital
- ALAmber Louie
University of British Columbia
- AOAleck Ostry
University of British Columbia
- PLPaul Landsbergis
State University of New York, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University
Topics & keywords
- Psychological intervention
- Intervention (counseling)
- Job stress
- Psychology
- Systematic review
- Applied psychology
- Job performance
- Occupational stress
- Decent work and economic growth