articleNew England Journal of MedicineJan 13, 2010Closed access

Comparison of Ustekinumab and Etanercept for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis

Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · University of Manchester · +8 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Biologic agents offer a range of new therapeutic options for patients with psoriasis; however, the relative benefit-risk profiles of such therapies are not well known. We compared two biologic agents, ustekinumab (an interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 blocker) and etanercept (an inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor alpha), for the treatment of psoriasis.

Methods

We randomly assigned 903 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis to receive subcutaneous injections of either 45 or 90 mg of ustekinumab (at weeks 0 and 4) or high-dose etanercept (50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with at least 75% improvement in the psoriasis area-and-severity index (PASI) at week 12; a secondary end point was the proportion with cleared or minimal disease on the basis of the physician's global assessment. Assessors were unaware of the treatment assignments. The efficacy and safety of a crossover from etanercept to ustekinumab were evaluated after week 12.

Citation impact

850
total citations
FWCI
32.92
Percentile
100%
References
29
Citations per year

Authors

13

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Ustekinumab
  • Medicine
  • Etanercept
  • Psoriasis
  • Psoriasis Area and Severity Index
  • Clinical endpoint
  • Internal medicine
  • Secukinumab
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.