Comparison of Ustekinumab and Etanercept for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · University of Manchester · +8 more institutions
Abstract
Biologic agents offer a range of new therapeutic options for patients with psoriasis; however, the relative benefit-risk profiles of such therapies are not well known. We compared two biologic agents, ustekinumab (an interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 blocker) and etanercept (an inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor alpha), for the treatment of psoriasis.
We randomly assigned 903 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis to receive subcutaneous injections of either 45 or 90 mg of ustekinumab (at weeks 0 and 4) or high-dose etanercept (50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with at least 75% improvement in the psoriasis area-and-severity index (PASI) at week 12; a secondary end point was the proportion with cleared or minimal disease on the basis of the physician's global assessment. Assessors were unaware of the treatment assignments. The efficacy and safety of a crossover from etanercept to ustekinumab were evaluated after week 12.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 32.92
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 29
Authors
13- CGC.E.M. GriffithsCorresponding
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester
- BSBruce Strober
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York University
- PVPeter van de Kerkhof
Radboud University Nijmegen
- VHVincent Ho
University of British Columbia
- RFRoseanne Fidelus-Gort
Incyte (United States)
Topics & keywords
- Ustekinumab
- Medicine
- Etanercept
- Psoriasis
- Psoriasis Area and Severity Index
- Clinical endpoint
- Internal medicine
- Secukinumab
- Good health and well-being