Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review
Abstract
Undertaking a review of the literature is an important part of any research project. The researcher both maps and assesses the relevant intellectual territory in order to specify a research question which will further develop the knowledge base. However, traditional ‘narrative’ reviews frequently lack thoroughness, and in many cases are not undertaken as genuine pieces of investigatory science. Consequently they can lack a means for making sense of what the collection of studies is saying. These reviews can be biased by the researcher and often lack rigour. Furthermore, the use of reviews of the available evidence to provide insights and guidance for intervention into operational needs of practitioners and…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 64
Authors
3- DTDavid TranfieldCorresponding
Cranfield University
- DDDavid Denyer
Cranfield University
- PSPalminder Smart
Cranfield University
Topics & keywords
- Rigour
- Systematic review
- Context (archaeology)
- Underpinning
- Engineering ethics
- Process (computing)
- Management science
- Knowledge base