reviewBMJApr 6, 2002BRONZE OA

Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

AGAndrew G. RenehanMEMatthias EggerMPMark P SaundersSTSarah T O'Dwyer

The Christie Hospital · University of Bristol · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intensive compared with control follow up. Main outcome measures: All cause mortality at five years (primary outcome). Rates of recurrence of intraluminal, local, and metastatic disease and metachronous (second colorectal primary) cancers (secondary outcomes).

Results

Five trials, which included 1342 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Intensive follow up was associated with a reduction in all cause mortality (combined risk ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.94, P=0.007). The effect was most pronounced in the four extramural detection trials that used computed tomography and frequent measurements of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (risk ratio 0.73, 0.60 to 0.89, P=0.002). Intensive follow up was associated with significantly earlier detection of all recurrences (difference in means 8.5 months, 7.6 to 9.4 months, P<0.001) and an increased detection rate for isolated local recurrences (risk ratio 1.61, 1.12 to 2.32, P=0.011).

Citation impact

652
total citations
FWCI
11.80
Percentile
100%
References
45
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Carcinoembryonic antigen
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Confidence interval
  • Meta-analysis
  • Internal medicine
  • Clinical trial
  • Randomized controlled trial
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.