articleStrategic Management JournalNov 6, 2015Closed access

Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research

Arizona State University

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Research summary: The use of Heckman models by strategy scholars to resolve sample selection bias has increased by more than 700 percent over the last decade, yet significant inconsistencies exist in how they have applied and interpreted these models. In view of these differences, we explore the drivers of sample selection bias and review how Heckman models alleviate it. We demonstrate three important findings for scholars seeking to use Heckman models: First, the independent variable of interest must be a significant predictor in the first stage of a model for sample selection bias to exist. Second, the significance of lambda alone does not indicate sample selection bias. Finally, Heckman models account for…

Citation impact

911
total citations
FWCI
25.78
Percentile
100%
References
37
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Selection bias
  • Endogeneity
  • Sample (material)
  • Omitted-variable bias
  • Selection (genetic algorithm)
  • Econometrics
  • Sample size determination
  • Sampling bias
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.