articleQuality of Life ResearchJul 5, 2011HYBRID OA

Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist

EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

The COSMIN checklist is a standardized tool for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties. It contains 9 boxes, each dealing with one measurement property, with 5-18 items per box about design aspects and statistical methods. Our aim was to develop a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist to calculate quality scores per measurement property when using the checklist in systematic reviews of measurement properties.

Methods

The scoring system was developed based on discussions among experts and testing of the scoring system on 46 articles from a systematic review. Four response options were defined for each COSMIN item (excellent, good, fair, and poor). A quality score per measurement property is obtained by taking the lowest rating of any item in a box ("worst score counts").

Citation impact

1,989
total citations
FWCI
50.46
Percentile
100%
References
23
Citations per year

Authors

6

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Checklist
  • Quality (philosophy)
  • Scoring system
  • Systematic review
  • Rating system
  • Computer science
  • Medicine
  • Medical physics
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • No poverty
No related works found for this paper.