articleNew England Journal of MedicineFeb 15, 2012BRONZE OA

Intramuscular versus Intravenous Therapy for Prehospital Status Epilepticus

University of Michigan · Medical University of South Carolina · +4 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Early termination of prolonged seizures with intravenous administration of benzodiazepines improves outcomes. For faster and more reliable administration, paramedics increasingly use an intramuscular route.

Methods

This double-blind, randomized, noninferiority trial compared the efficacy of intramuscular midazolam with that of intravenous lorazepam for children and adults in status epilepticus treated by paramedics. Subjects whose convulsions had persisted for more than 5 minutes and who were still convulsing after paramedics arrived were given the study medication by either intramuscular autoinjector or intravenous infusion. The primary outcome was absence of seizures at the time of arrival in the emergency department without the need for rescue therapy. Secondary outcomes included endotracheal intubation, recurrent seizures, and timing of treatment relative to the cessation of convulsive seizures. This trial tested the hypothesis that intramuscular midazolam was noninferior to intravenous lorazepam by a margin of 10 percentage points.

Citation impact

727
total citations
FWCI
42.06
Percentile
100%
References
11
Citations per year

Authors

7

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Lorazepam
  • Status epilepticus
  • Midazolam
  • Anesthesia
  • Emergency department
  • Intubation
  • Intravenous therapy
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding