Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?
Virginia Tech · Washington University in St. Louis
Abstract
Abstract Relational exchange arrangements supported by trust are commonly viewed as substitutes for complex contracts in interorganizational exchanges. Many argue that formal contracts actually undermine trust and thereby encourage the opportunistic behavior they are designed to discourage. In this paper, we develop and test an alternative perspective: that formal contracts and relational governance function as complements. Using data from a sample of information service exchanges, we find empirical support for this proposition of complementarity. Managers appear to couple their increasingly customized contracts with high levels of relational governance (and vice versa). Moreover, this interdependence…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 52.47
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 81
Authors
2Topics & keywords
- Complementarity (molecular biology)
- Corporate governance
- Proposition
- Business
- Function (biology)
- Perspective (graphical)
- Industrial organization
- Microeconomics
- Partnerships for the goals