articleStrategic Management JournalMay 1, 2002BRONZE OA

Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?

Virginia Tech · Washington University in St. Louis

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Abstract Relational exchange arrangements supported by trust are commonly viewed as substitutes for complex contracts in interorganizational exchanges. Many argue that formal contracts actually undermine trust and thereby encourage the opportunistic behavior they are designed to discourage. In this paper, we develop and test an alternative perspective: that formal contracts and relational governance function as complements. Using data from a sample of information service exchanges, we find empirical support for this proposition of complementarity. Managers appear to couple their increasingly customized contracts with high levels of relational governance (and vice versa). Moreover, this interdependence…

Citation impact

3,587
total citations
FWCI
52.47
Percentile
100%
References
81
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Complementarity (molecular biology)
  • Corporate governance
  • Proposition
  • Business
  • Function (biology)
  • Perspective (graphical)
  • Industrial organization
  • Microeconomics
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Partnerships for the goals
No related works found for this paper.

Funding