articleNew England Journal of MedicineSep 4, 2013BRONZE OA

Results of the Two Incidence Screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial

University of California, Los Angeles · Brown University · +6 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

The National Lung Screening Trial was conducted to determine whether three annual screenings (rounds T0, T1, and T2) with low-dose helical computed tomography (CT), as compared with chest radiography, could reduce mortality from lung cancer. We present detailed findings from the first two incidence screenings (rounds T1 and T2).

Methods

We evaluated the rate of adherence of the participants to the screening protocol, the results of screening and downstream diagnostic tests, features of the lung-cancer cases, and first-line treatments, and we estimated the performance characteristics of both screening methods.

Citation impact

557
total citations
FWCI
40.68
Percentile
100%
References
23
Citations per year

Authors

18

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Predictive value
  • National Lung Screening Trial
  • Radiography
  • Stage (stratigraphy)
  • Incidence (geometry)
  • Lung cancer screening
  • Predictive value of tests
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding