Results of the Two Incidence Screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial
University of California, Los Angeles · Brown University · +6 more institutions
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Background
The National Lung Screening Trial was conducted to determine whether three annual screenings (rounds T0, T1, and T2) with low-dose helical computed tomography (CT), as compared with chest radiography, could reduce mortality from lung cancer. We present detailed findings from the first two incidence screenings (rounds T1 and T2).
Methods
We evaluated the rate of adherence of the participants to the screening protocol, the results of screening and downstream diagnostic tests, features of the lung-cancer cases, and first-line treatments, and we estimated the performance characteristics of both screening methods.
Citation impact
557
total citations
- FWCI
- 40.68
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 23
Citations per year
Authors
18Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Medicine
- Predictive value
- National Lung Screening Trial
- Radiography
- Stage (stratigraphy)
- Incidence (geometry)
- Lung cancer screening
- Predictive value of tests
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.
Funding
- ACAmerican College of Radiology Imaging NetworkAwards: U01-CA-80098, U01-CA-79778
- UOUniversity of Minnesota
- WUWashington University in St. Louis
- HFHenry Ford Health System
- UOUniversity of Utah
- UOUniversity of Pittsburgh
- GUGeorgetown University
- UOUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham
- UOUniversity of Alabama
- UOUniversity of Colorado Denver
- NCNational Cancer InstituteAwards: U01-CA-80098, N01-CN-25512, N01-CN-25511, N01-CN-25513, N01-CN-25515