articleJournal of Clinical OncologySep 26, 2002Closed access

Randomized Clinical Trial of an Implantable Drug Delivery System Compared With Comprehensive Medical Management for Refractory Cancer Pain: Impact on Pain, Drug-Related Toxicity, and Survival

Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

PURPOSE: Implantable intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDSs) have been used to manage refractory cancer pain, but there are no randomized clinical trial (RCT) data comparing them with comprehensive medical management (CMM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 202 patients on an RCT of CMM versus IDDS plus CMM. Entry criteria included unrelieved pain (visual analog scale [VAS] pain scores >/= 5 on a 0 to 10 scale). Clinical success was defined as >/= 20% reduction in VAS scores, or equal scores with >/= 20% reduction in toxicity. The main outcome measure was pain control combined with change of toxicity, as measured by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, 4 weeks after randomization. RESULTS:…

Citation impact

717
total citations
FWCI
22.19
Percentile
100%
References
30
Citations per year

Authors

11

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Visual analogue scale
  • Toxicity
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Refractory (planetary science)
  • Clinical trial
  • Randomization
  • Cancer pain
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.