The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
This review compared the accuracy of various approaches to the prediction of recidivism among sexual offenders. On the basis of a meta-analysis of 536 findings drawn from 118 distinct samples (45,398 sexual offenders, 16 countries), empirically derived actuarial measures were more accurate than unstructured professional judgment for all outcomes (sexual, violent, or any recidivism). The accuracy of structured professional judgment was intermediate between the accuracy found for the actuarial measures and for unstructured professional judgment. The effect sizes for the actuarial measures were moderate to large by conventional standards (average d values of 0.67-0.97); however, the utility of the actuarial…
Citation impact
1,042
total citations
- FWCI
- 64.62
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 128
Citations per year
Authors
2Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Recidivism
- PsycINFO
- Psychology
- Sex offense
- Meta-analysis
- Referral
- Risk assessment
- Poison control
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Gender equality
No related works found for this paper.