Evolution of Mechanical Ventilation in Response to Clinical Research

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · Hospital Universitario de Getafe · +32 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objectives

To describe current mechanical ventilation practices and to assess the influence of interval randomized trials when compared with findings from a 1998 cohort.

Methods

A prospective international observational cohort study, with a nested comparative study performed in 349 intensive care units in 23 countries. We enrolled 4,968 consecutive patients receiving mechanical ventilation over a 1-month period. We recorded demographics and daily data related to mechanical ventilation for the duration of ventilation. We systematically reviewed the literature and developed 11 practice-change hypotheses for the comparative cohort study before seeing these results. In assessing practice changes, we only compared data from the 107 intensive care units (1,675 patients) that also participated in the 1998 cohort (1,383 patients). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In 2004 compared with 1998, the use of noninvasive ventilation increased (11.1 vs. 4.4%, P

Citation impact

729
total citations
FWCI
27.07
Percentile
100%
References
69
Citations per year

Authors

23

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Intensive care
  • Ventilation (architecture)
  • Cohort study
  • Cohort
  • Concordance
No related works found for this paper.