reviewBMJApr 6, 2002BRONZE OA

Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors

SHSue HorrocksEAElizabeth AndersonCSChris Salisbury

University of Bristol · Primary Health Care · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Design

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies. Data sources: Cochrane controlled trials register, specialist register of trials maintained by Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, science citation index, database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness, national research register, hand searches, and published bibliographies. Included studies: Randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies comparing nurse practitioners and doctors providing care at first point of contact for patients with undifferentiated health problems in a primary care setting and providing data on one or more of the following outcomes: patient satisfaction, health status, costs, and process of care.

Results

11 trials and 23 observational studies met all the inclusion criteria. Patients were more satisfied with care by a nurse practitioner (standardised mean difference 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.47). No differences in health status were found. Nurse practitioners had longer consultations (weighted mean difference 3.67 minutes, 2.05 to 5.29) and made more investigations (odds ratio 1.22, 1.02 to 1.46) than did doctors. No differences were found in prescriptions, return consultations, or referrals. Quality of care was in some ways better for nurse practitioner consultations.

Citation impact

1,248
total citations
FWCI
112.58
Percentile
100%
References
25
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Observational study
  • Family medicine
  • CINAHL
  • MEDLINE
  • Odds ratio
  • Nursing
  • Health care
No related works found for this paper.