articleThe Annals of Family MedicineJul 1, 2008DIAMOND OA

Evaluative Criteria for Qualitative Research in Health Care: Controversies and Recommendations

University of Dental Medicine · Johnson University · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

We identified published journal articles discussing criteria for rigorous research using standard search strategies then examined reference sections of relevant journal articles to identify books and book chapters on this topic. A cross-publication content analysis allowed us to identify criteria and understand the beliefs that shape them.

Results

Seven criteria for good qualitative research emerged: (1) carrying out ethical research; (2) importance of the research; (3) clarity and coherence of the research report; (4) use of appropriate and rigorous methods; (5) importance of reflexivity or attending to researcher bias; (6) importance of establishing validity or credibility; and (7) importance of verification or reliability. General agreement was observed across publications on the first 4 quality dimensions. On the last 3, important divergent perspectives were observed in how these criteria should be applied to qualitative research, with differences based on the paradigm embraced by the authors.

Citation impact

836
total citations
FWCI
56.98
Percentile
100%
References
176
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Qualitative research
  • CLARITY
  • Credibility
  • Set (abstract data type)
  • Medicine
  • Research design
  • Consistency (knowledge bases)
  • Medical education
No related works found for this paper.