Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients
Erasmus MC · Erasmus University Rotterdam
Abstract
AIMS: Although outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) seemed to be superior with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) relative to fibrinolysis (FL), the extent to which treatment delay modulates this treatment effect is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five randomized trials (n = 7743) testing the efficacy of PPCI vs. FL were identified in journal articles and abstract listings published between 1990 and 2002. Of these, individual patient data from 22 trials (n = 6763) were pooled, and multi-level logistic regression assessed the relationship among treatment, treatment delay, and 30-day mortality. Treatment delay was divided into 'presentation delay' [symptom onset to randomization;…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 39.51
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 54
Authors
1Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Percutaneous coronary intervention
- Conventional PCI
- Myocardial infarction
- Fibrinolysis
- Randomization
- Randomized controlled trial
- Internal medicine
- Good health and well-being