articleEuropean Heart JournalMar 2, 2006BRONZE OA

Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients

Erasmus MC · Erasmus University Rotterdam

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

AIMS: Although outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) seemed to be superior with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) relative to fibrinolysis (FL), the extent to which treatment delay modulates this treatment effect is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five randomized trials (n = 7743) testing the efficacy of PPCI vs. FL were identified in journal articles and abstract listings published between 1990 and 2002. Of these, individual patient data from 22 trials (n = 6763) were pooled, and multi-level logistic regression assessed the relationship among treatment, treatment delay, and 30-day mortality. Treatment delay was divided into 'presentation delay' [symptom onset to randomization;…

Citation impact

683
total citations
FWCI
39.51
Percentile
100%
References
54
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Conventional PCI
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Fibrinolysis
  • Randomization
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Internal medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding